Skip to Main Content

Public Health: Study Types

Observational & Experimental Studies

Observational Studies:

  • The researchers "allow nature to takes its course" by measuring but not intervening
  • They can be descriptive or analytical.
    • descriptive observational study describes the disease in a population.
    • An analytical observational study goes a step further by analyzing the relationship between health and other variables. 

Experimental Studies:

  • Experimental Studies, also called intervention studies, intervene in an active attempt to change an exposure, behavior, or disease. 
 

 

Case Control (Observational)

  • Starts with disease and goes backwards in time looking for the exposure.
  • Compares a group with the disease and without the disease.
  • The main outcome is odds ratio.
  • Better for rare diseases.

Advantages:

  • They are fairly quick and cheap.
  • Usually are the most important way to investigate rare diseases.
  • They don't require a huge number of subjects.
  • You investigate multiple causes of a disease.

Disadvantages:

  • Often relies on a person remembering things which can lead to recall bias.
  • Only investigate cases that have been identified or diagnosed.
  • Selecting controls relies on the researcher's judgment.
  • Cannot determine the rate or risk of a disease in the exposed and nonexposed.
  • Cannot prove a cause and effect.

Case Study/Case Series (Observational)

  • Purely descriptive.
  • Often describe a new disease with an unclear cause.
  • No control group
  • Considered the lowest level of evidence, but also the first line of evidence
  • Do not address causality
  • Do not provide prevalence

Cohort (Observational)

  • Starts with exposure
  • Looks at a group over time.
  • Grouped together because there is a common experience or exposure.
  • Looks for relative risk.
  • Looks for exposure and then disease.
  • Does not work with rare diseases.

Advantages:

  • They are the only study type that can determine the absolute risk of contracting a disease. 

Cross-Sectional (Observational)

  • Survey of a population at a single point in time (usually a day or less than month) -- a "snapshot" in time.
  • Used for population- based surveys to determine the prevalence of disease.
  • Measures the outcome and the exposure(s) in the population at the same time.
  • Frequency of disease and risk factors are identified.
  • The main outcome is prevalence.
  • Can't determine relative risk or odds ratio.*
  • Do not address causality.

* You can estimate OR.

Epidemiological Studies - made easy!

Crossover (Experimental)

  • Patients in a crossover study will "crossover" to another treatment arm during course of the trial.
  • This means that even if they are initially put into a placebo arm, they will also eventually receive the study drug or standard of care during the trial.
  • Data integrity is ensured by instituting a washout period—a gap in between arms where patients don't receive any medication—in order to reduce carryover effects from the previous treatments.
  • Crossover studies are often used when researchers feel it would be difficult to recruit participants willing to risk going without a promising new treatment.

Meta-Analysis (Experimental)

A meta-analysis is a statistical technique that allows researchers to combine the findings of multiple independent studies. It is the type of study that is most frequently used to assess the clinical effectiveness of a healthcare intervention and provides the highest level of evidence of the choices given.

Meta-analysis would be used for the following purposes:

  • To establish statistical significance with studies that have conflicting results. 
  • To develop a more correct estimate of effect magnitude To provide a more complex analysis of harms, safety data, and benefits.
  • To examine subgroups with individual numbers that are not statistically significant.
  • Provides the highest level of evidence for efficacy of a drug.

Randomized Controlled Trial (Experimental)

  • A study design that randomly assigns participants into an experimental group or a control group.
  • As the study is conducted, the only expected difference between the control and experimental groups in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the outcome variable being studied.
  • You must have an intervention and a comparison group.

* Randomized double blind placebo control studies are the "Gold Standard" research design in intervention based studies.

What to Look For

Hierarchy of Evidence


© Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine Library ι Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine ι 445 Health Sciences Boulevard, Dothan, AL 36303 ι (334) 699-2266 ext. 4242 ι Contact Us